Human Rights Activist Demands Retrial for Bill Cosby, O.J. Simpson & R. Kelly

Dreymod Green, a human rights activist, has been working for several months with the NAACP to reopen the cases of Bill Cosby, O.J. Simpson & R. Kelly.  According to him, it’s about time someone said it, “Black people need to stop flushing their celebrities down the toilet every time they get into legal trouble.”

There is a conspiracy theory where I’m aligned with black people on to a degree, says Dreymod Green.  He is referring to the conspiracy theory that police officers are out to set up and convict rich & famous black American men. Which is why, every time a famous black man gets in trouble, Dreymond immediately argues their innocence. You can even show him a video tape of a black celebrity allegedly committing a crime and immediately he will respond with, “Man, that tape is photoshopped or it's ai generated.”

For example, let’s take the O.J. Simpson case. Dreymond is disappointed that the black community threw O.J. under the bus, i.e. “We knew O.J. did it, we just wanted to see a black man beat the white man judicial system.” Without getting into the details of the case, let’s just look at the high level facts.

Number 1, O.J. is too dumb to be given the title of the man who got away with the murder of the century; and I say that with all due respect says Dreymond!

Physically, he’s The Juice! On an intellectual level, I don’t give him that much of credit. To be the most wanted man in America, where the cops are ready to put you away for anything as simple as jay walking or littering, this genius decides to go to Las Vegas i.e. Sin City i.e. the place you go to where you know ahead of time you’re probably going to do something to get in trouble. Not an intelligent move.

Number 2, how dumb do you have to be, to get in trouble for trying to, and I say in quotation marks, "Steal your own shit?"

Number 3, anyone who has ever committed a crime and got away with it, knows, that the last thing you ever do, is mention or talk about that crime. This genius instead, decides to write an entire book about it. And on top of that, he titles the book, “IF, I did it.” He might as well write the words “Guilty” or “Arrest Me” on his forehead.

Number 4, the cop leading the case against O.J., Mark Fuhrman, was proven to be a notorious racist against black people generally, and inter-racial couples specifically. And not Japanese men dating Filipinos, no he didn’t care about that all, but black men with white women drove him bananas apparently.

Number 5, this notoriously racist white cop, Mark Fuhrman, got caught lying under oath, which should be enough of a guarantee to never get a job ever again. If you’ll lie to a judge, you’ll definitely lie to your boss. And where does this guy get a job out of all places? Fox news! Everyone knows you can’t get a job at Fox News unless you’re a covert racist.

Number 6, the infamous glove. The main piece of evidence in the trial, now let’s think about this for a moment.

If you’re going to commit a crime, the whole point of putting on a glove, is to not leave evidence. So how does the instrument or tool which you use to not leave evidence, become the central piece of evidence in court? Is this some kind of twisted irony or cosmic sarcasm?

I can understand dropping your car keys, or dropping a wallet. Who drops a glove? You just look at your hands and you go, “Hey I’m missing my glove, where’s it at?”

Conclusion, O.J. Simpson is innocent!

I’ll even defend the indefensible, I think Bill Cosby is innocent; on a legal level! Morally speaking, he’s despicable for what he did, but legally speaking, he’s innocent.

How many women did he allegedly assault, 392 women and still counting? Okay, if you understand anything about statistics or the law of averages, you should know that at least 3 or 4 of these women should have reported it back then when it happened.

And we are supposed to believe that all 392 of these women, who did not know each other, coincidentally came to the same conclusion of coming forward with the allegations all at the same time? So all 392 women back in the 1960s had the same thought? i.e.

Conclusion, seems like a calculated character assassination to me.

Even if Bill Cosby did commit those crimes, at least give him credit for being a gentleman about it. If you were to ask 10 ladies the following hypothetical question, “Ladies listen, you are going to get sexually assaulted, but you get to choose between two options of how it happens. Option A is, a Puerto Rican is going to jump out of the bushes in Central Park and take that puntang or Option B, Mr. Cosby is going to give you some “Skittles,” and you’ll wake up in the morning with no memory of what happened and your body will be feeling wonderful for some reason.”

What option do you think most women are going to go with? So if Bill Cosby is indeed guilty, at least he’s a gentleman about it.

I’ll even go as far as defending the absolutely indefensible. I think R. Kelly is innocent. Again, morally, he’s despicable, legally though, I have some doubts.

Hypothetical question, who is more guilty, the butcher or the shepherd that leads his flock to the slaughter house instead of the pasture? Again, they’re both guilty, but equally or one is more guilty than the other?

All of the victims said the same thing, “Our parents, took us to see R. Kelly.” Now I’m not saying R. Kelly is a butcher, but he is a pisser. Meaning, if you take someone to R. Kelly’s house, they are probably going to get pissed on. That’s just what R Kelly does.

Conclusion, let the man piss in peace.